by Terrence Halloran
979 Hidden Oaks Drive, Beaumont CA 92223
You started working for this company in May, 1984. Jim Ray hired you as an
analyst programmer specialist. He was a manager in the Logistics Support
Management Information System (LSMIS) programming group. You were project
leader of Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) data base integration. The narrative
that follows is your one-sided view of what happened during the next ten
and a half years.
A lot of LSMIS action items needed resolution to help make the software work
correctly. Your co-worker Joe Metz developed a small system for keeping track
of these action items. Jim Ray's manager Norvel Humphreys said he liked the
automated tracking method and asked Joe to expand its capabilities. He didn't
tell him that another employee, Harry Mauz, was busy installing a system
that would replace his. When Joe found out, he was politely angry. Quietly
commending Joe's effort and criticizing Norvel's deception, and probably
for other reasons, Jim began looking for a new job. You and Kurt Belfils
worked in a cubicle next to his and heard some of his phone conversations
with employment recruiters. You don't know when or why he changed his mind,
but Jim Ray decided to stay.
Herb Anderson, then vice president of Information Resource Management (IRM)
at your division, was Norvel's boss. You learned that an agency named Top
Professionals, also known as Circle Ten, was recruiting contract employees
for your department. You sent a series of notes to Herb, listing this and
several other conflict of interest indicators. Finally he called you and
said Employee Relations would contact you soon. A few days later the division
manager of employee relations asked you to meet him in his office. He told
you Herb Anderson had become very concerned about LSMIS management long before
he heard from you. He said you could expect prompt and significant action.
Several weeks after this meeting, Norvel Humphreys was demoted and left the
company voluntarily. Jim Ray was eventually promoted to take his place.
You replaced Jim Duval as project leader of the ILS failure reporting, analysis
and corrective action system (FRACAS). You were at lunch with Jim Ray one
day when he mentioned democracy in South Africa. He said the white minority
should remain in power there, and our government should oppose giving voting
rights to the other racial groups. You told him he wouldn't be talking like
that if he were a black South African. He said ending apartheid would cause
a communist takeover of that strategic country. You were surprised, because
you had seen Jim handle many hiring decisions and employee problems where
race was a factor, and he was always admirably careful and fair. For the
next year and a half you collected news photos and articles about human rights
protests in South Africa. You posted more and more of these items above and
near your desk. You favored those that showed Anglican and Roman Catholic
clergy marching for justice or being punished for opposing racial laws. Whenever
anyone asked about this display of religion in action, you described your
disagreement with Jim Ray. You said you want him to know you still oppose
apartheid. Jim never told you to remove the newspaper clippings. But he stopped
at your desk occasionally and made negative comments. He reminded you that
employees who say what they think and tell what they know seldom become managers.
You took that as a welcome compliment.
Garth Rice was your manager when you had a mysterious brain hemorrhage in
April, 1986. Concerned because you didn't phone or come to work that morning,
he asked his secretary to call you at home. Your wife tried to wake you up,
then dialed 911. Paramedics took you to the hospital, where you regained
consciousness the next day. Garth made sure you received your paychecks during
the next seven weeks, while you recovered gradually and completely.
After you returned to work, you succeeded Bill Carney as project leader of
the ILS logistics support analysis (LSA) programming team. You finished testing
an important program that would change the root keys in selected LSA data
base records. But the reliability and maintainability (R and M) team wasn't
ready yet, and your system was tied closely to theirs. Harold Himes, a contract
employee in ILS, suggested you could temporarily modify the few LSA programs
that need R and M data, then install your changes independently. You agreed
this was a good idea. But when you asked Garth Rice if you could go ahead,
he said no. Don Knight, Dana Berry and Guy Battaglia had already talked with
him, and they thought you should wait. When you mentioned this decision to
ILS employee Terry Booth, he was disappointed. Lew Israelitt, then director
of Integrated Logistics Support, heard about it through Terry's manager.
Lew asked Herb Anderson to implement the LSA changes without waiting for
R and M. Garth Rice told you to proceed, but that he didn't appreciate your
going outside management channels with your recommendations. You reminded
him that the suggestion came from Harold Himes, not from you. But you said
you were grateful that someone had intervened.
A few months later, you became project leader of ILS system migration. Phil
Graham was your manager then. He and Garth Rice decided you would track software
modifications by asking each project leader to submit a weekly list of changes
made by his or her programming team. You said an automated comparison program
would be easier to use and more accurate. A month later, you itemized for
Phil all the LSMIS modules changed recently that weren't included in the
lists prepared by the project leaders. When Jim Ray heard about this, he
asked you some questions. Then he urged Phil to yield to your opinion on
the issue. You continued to receive the weekly lists of changes, but ignored
them in your migration update process. Phil told you he didn't like the fact
that you had insisted on working your way instead of his. This was the only
major problem you ever had with him. You enjoyed working for Phil Graham
because he's very talented, dedicated and humorous.
After this company bought Configuration and Change Control (CCC), you became
a member of the implementation team. CCC keeps track of software changes
through automated check-out and check-in procedures. During your training
and initial experience using the product, you decided it had serious
shortcomings. You reported your concerns to the team members, and later to
Jim Ray through your new manager Rick Rivera. But they didn't want to rock
the boat. Your team leader Dan Boyer confidently initiated a pilot project
to test the effectiveness of CCC. Pat McGinnis, the leader of the pilot project,
urged you to put aside your negative feelings. You told her the product,
not your attitude, was defective. She suggested you could ask Rick Rivera
for a different assignment. You agreed eagerly. The pilot project continued
for another two years without you, but CCC was never implemented successfully
at this company. Jim Ray and Kurt Belfils thanked you privately for warning
them that the effort would fail.
When Jim Ray was transferred to another department, Kurt Belfils was promoted
to his position. Ron Glassman asked his manager Phil Mastio if he could take
personal business time to observe the Yom Kippur holy day. Kurt made a few
inquiries, then told Phil that only vacation or unpaid time could be used
for this purpose. You sent notes protesting this decision to Kurt's boss
Dana Taylor, and later to Herb Anderson and Employee Relations. Herb told
you Ron's request couldn't be honored because of corporate policy. The division
employee relations manager confirmed this, saying he personally was ashamed
of the policy. When Rick Rivera supported management's position during a
department staff meeting, you disagreed. You said this company has screwy
values if we can take personal business time to meet with our children's
teachers during school hours, but not to attend church or temple services
on a holy day.
At the LSMIS 1988 year-end holiday party, you gave this invocation: "Eternal
author of the operating system of the universe, we are impressed. Your
programming skill is unlimited, your wisdom in selecting from available options
is infinite. The more we analyze the complex systems you have designed and
implemented, the more we admire their structured beauty and efficient
performance. Master control programmer, we thank you for installing and
maintaining user friendly links between our data bases and yours. You honor
our requests for guidance and strength, you share directly in our history,
and you allow us virtual access to your boundless love. Fault-tolerant generator
of guidelines for this world, override the moral errors we have failed to
bypass. Expand our capacity to refresh the divine and human relationships
we have corrupted. Enable us to follow the correct logical path your standards
require. Generous creator of the hardware and software of heaven and earth,
give us the spiritual resources we need to program our lives. Help us compute
ways to resolve religious, economic, military and racial fanaticism around
our planet. When death disconnects us from this temporary data set, join
us intimately and permanently to you. Enhance our finite systems with your
peace and justice and love, now and forever."
Your merit increase that year was very small. Rick Rivera wasn't your manager
when your performance was reviewed six months earlier, so you requested a
written explanation. His memo said this: "I received many complaints from
people on the CCC team that you were difficult to work with, that you expressed
your concerns in a non-professional manner. They felt that you should have
handled issues in a more mature fashion, that you were very demoralizing.
On more than one occasion, people have asked me why you're so negative about
IRM. Again, this is demoralizing to the organization. On a number of occasions,
you've complained about some of the IRM procedures. But I rarely received
any recommendations on how to improve the environment. I feel that you have
not exhibited above average performance during 1988, and you were rewarded
accordingly."
The following summer you officiated at the marriage of your co-workers Joy
Miller and Larry Bonham. Many LSMIS programmers and managers and their spouses
came to the wedding and reception. During the ceremony you mentioned Joy's
and Larry's personal qualities and technical skills. You congratulated them
for taking this brave step, and prayed for God's blessing on their married
life.
Your manager then was Phil Mastio, and you were project leader of LSMIS software
configuration management. You and the other project leaders were enrolled
in a systems analysis course taught by Dana Taylor and Tammy Brody. They
showed you how to use the IMS online programs Tammy had written to estimate
project costs. They taught you some ways to chart progress toward project
milestones using the Artemis Menu System (ARMS). They explained various
techniques for feasibility studies and requirements gathering. After the
first week, Kurt Belfils asked whether you liked the course. You told him
it gives you an all-day pain in the gut and antacid tablets don't help. He
asked if you were learning anything useful. You said so far you've learned
two things: you never want to be a systems analyst, at least not at this
company, and Tammy Brody has the brownest nose in IRM. Kurt stopped smiling
and walked away.
Invited to give the invocation at the 1989 LSMIS year-end party, you offered
this prayer: "Merciful God, bless the volunteers who help the homeless,
especially during this holiday season. Give them poor people who are not
violent and angry, who do not abuse each other, who do not take drugs or
use alcohol, who are not hopeless. Lord, give them poor people who are not
of our own making, who have the opportunity to work for a just wage, who
go to schools that teach more about learning than failure, who are not victimized
by the swift advance of technology and the even swifter decline of family,
community and social support systems. Father in heaven, your children who
work among the less fortunate are a scandal, their lives are a waste poured
out to no avail upon the poor. They feed the hungry and clothe the naked
and shelter the homeless. But they do not reform or convert the poor. They
reform and convert themselves and give witness to the suffering and abuse
of the poor which indicts us all. Generous savior, reward the efforts of
the soup kitchen workers as they give out blankets, break up fights and chase
away crack and heroin dealers. Help them provide dining facilities with trees
and plants and even fountains. A touch of beauty. Another scandalous gift
to the poor, but a sign of the coming kingdom in which your eternal and boundless
love will overflow like precious perfumed oil." Tim Roth told you later the
prayer was ugly and inappropriate. You thanked him for his comments.
Garth Rice was your manager again when the Contractor Repair Support (CRS)
programming team began coding and testing some DB2 programs. They were using
a new version of the Application Productivity System (APS) software. Kurt
Belfils and Garth Rice assigned you to help support their test activities.
At your request, Mike Costanza made you the owner of the APS test data sets.
You changed various job control statements and APS control records to meet
the needs of the CRS team. Then you designed and coded the input panel, programs
and JCL that Production Support would use to move and compile APS source
modules. Mike Costanza reviewed your coding and told his manager Connie Moore
it probably wouldn't work. Don Knight, the manager responsible for CRS, met
with you, Mike and Connie. She supported Mike's view, but Don wanted to give
you a chance. After you ran some test jobs and showed Don the printouts,
he was satisfied.
Later that year, you received a merit increase that was so small you asked
Garth Rice for a written explanation. He refused, so you sent a note to Kurt
Belfils. Kurt suggested an interim performance review, and Garth agreed.
A few days later you gave Garth your written input to the evaluation. Then
every three or four months you called him or his new manager Jim Ray, or
sent a note reminding him that his response was overdue. After nearly two
years, Grace Mason-Brown of Employee Relations, Kurt Belfils and Garth Rice
held a meeting about you without you. They issued a memo that unilaterally
canceled the interim performance review and explained how you could get better
merit increases in the future. When you protested, Kurt talked you out of
pursuing the matter. You told him this company is a good place to work when
managers evaluate their employees fairly and honor their commitments. A few
days later Garth went to lunch with Kurt to celebrate his victory. You still
thank him occasionally for helping save your life in 1986.
Meanwhile, your department had moved to another building. Rich Mills was
your new manager, and Michael Gomes was your new cubicle partner. Lee Childs
had warned you never to discuss religion or politics with Michael. Ignoring
this advice, you quickly discovered how little you have in common. Michael
told you the three identical pairs of narrow lines in bar codes represent
the number 666. You laughed and said exactly three of the last six Democratic
party presidents had six letters in their last names. You gave him a list
of employees who have three sixes in their work phone number or employee
number. He lent you a book warning believers about technologies like electronic
banking that use the number 666. You read it and said the author, who doesn't
even know how to write the ancient Greek numeral six, is spreading a silly
superstition.
When you heard Michael say it's OK if a man calls his wife "babe," you told
him that word is an insult to adult women everywhere. You called him an
oppressive male chauvinist. You made it clear that every marriage should
be an equal partnership, that the Bible forbids distinctions between male
and female. He said "wives, obey your husbands" is still the rule for Christians.
He asked if you were ever born again. You answered yes, in 1934 at the Santa
Barbara Mission parish church where your parents were married. You disagreed
with his opinion that God sends people to hell for not believing in Jesus.
He let you know it's not an opinion and urged you to read your Bible more
carefully. You quoted from the prophet Micah, saying all the Lord asks of
us is that we act justly, love tenderly and walk humbly with our God.
You read a book Michael brought to work that attacks Darwin's theory of
evolution. You informed him that in 1633 the pope attacked and condemned
Galileo's theory that the earth moves around the sun. He never liked the
poster over your desk. It says Jesus was once asked to support the death
penalty and replied "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." He
shuddered when you showed him Cardinal Roger Mahony's statement opposing
the death penalty. When you saw Michael reading a book by television evangelist
Pat Robertson, you asked if Robertson preaches that voting for Bill Clinton
is a sin. You said it's clear Clinton believes abortions should be safe,
legal and rare, but it's not clear if he means safe for the baby or safe
for the mother. Michael didn't smile. You told him God forbids needless killing
of unborn children, but doesn't command us to send people to jail for abortion.
Michael Gomes says he won't discuss religion or politics with you any more
because you're very opinionated.
Jeff Miller was your manager when two Los Angeles police officers accused
of beating Rodney King were tried in federal court. You made the corridor
wall near your desk a center for information about the case. You favored
newspaper stories and editorials that presented more than one point of view.
But everyone knew you were cheering for the prosecution. You joked that Los
Angeles mayor Tom Bradley asked police chief Daryl Gates if he needed a
piñata for the Cinco de Mayo celebration at police headquarters. You
said he answered, "No, thanks. We have a suspect in custody." Several months
passed before Jeff asked you not to post newspaper clippings outside your
cubicle. You displayed a few of them at your desk, and put the rest away.
When Nancy Gunter transferred to a department nearer her home, Debbie Sanzone
was selected to replace her as software control librarian. Mike DeBruyn,
who was in charge of LSMIS while Kurt Belfils was on vacation, asked you
to train Debbie. You helped her move a few APS and PANVALET programs into
the integrated test environment and compile them. Discouraged, you told Mike
she wasn't qualified for her new assignment. He asked how you could reach
such a sweeping conclusion after less than a day of training. You said it
was clear in ten minutes that Debbie can't tell COBOL from DYL-280, or JCL
from MFS. You explained why her intelligence, team spirit and hard work are
no substitute for knowledge. You reminded him that Nancy Gunter has an AA
degree in information science. A few weeks later Kurt Belfils asked why no
one had trained Debbie Sanzone. He listened to Mike DeBruyn's excuses and
made some inquiries. Then he told Jeff Miller to hire Sony Harmon, or someone
with similar skills, to take Nancy's place.
After nine years in LSMIS, you became a lead programmer in Manufacturing
Resource Planning (MRP). Your new manager Aldie Thomas asked if you were
interested in learning to be a Software Quality Assurance (SQA) reviewer.
You said yes, and he gave your name to the SQA team. But during reviewer
training you asked too many questions about audit and evaluation of software.
Aldie's acting manager Joe Compositor asked him to replace you, and Gloria
Simonson took your place. You complained to Dana Taylor, saying the Software
Engineering Institute (SEI) manual states clearly that SQA reviews software
work products to verify compliance with standards, procedures and contracts.
You pointed out that some team members don't want to discuss this and don't
want to hear it mentioned, and they're telling SQA reviewers there is no
such requirement. Three months later you gave the same information to Roy
Hardinge, the manager responsible for software procedures, and sent John
Avery a copy.
John wasn't pleased. He wrote a 580-word message, telling you a lot of things
that aren't true: that you accused Pat Zinn of getting you removed from your
reviewer position, that Bill Bunger told you about John Avery's discussions
with Mary Beth Chrissis and Leitha Purcell, that you came to SQA training
prepared to "nail" Bill Bunger, that you predicted we would fail the SEI
assessment, that you can't put aside your preconceived ideas and work for
the betterment of all of us and our customers. You forwarded John's note
to Joe Compositor, asking for an opportunity to discuss it. When Joe refused,
you contacted Employee Relations. John Avery agreed to meet with you and
Grace Mason-Brown in her office. After the meeting, John sent this message:
"I said to Grace that if I was to be called back again on this issue I would
like Dana Taylor, Charlie White, Joe Compositor, Roy Hardinge, Bill Bunger,
Pat Zinn and Terri Normandin also in the room so that we could maybe put
this issue to bed for the last time. Too much time, energy and money have
been spent. I'm afraid Grace might still find me rather hostile, but this
whole thing has gone way too far." John said your problem is you think management
has adopted his "unsubstantiated" view of your performance and abilities,
and you think that view needs correcting.
A few weeks later, Joe Compositor finally met with you. He apologized for
making it necessary for you to involve Employee Relations. He listened to
your rebuttal of some of John Avery's allegations. He agreed that you were
only trying to do what's right for this company, that retaining and improving
our favorable SEI rating is a responsibility we all share. He said he didn't
like John's angry reaction any more than you did. You thanked each other
and shook hands. Later that year you met with Roy Hardinge. You asked whether
he had any documented rationale for replacing SQA audit and review of software
work products with SQA participation in reviews or walkthroughs of software
work products. You said apparently no one has shown that audit and evaluation
are more costly or less effective than participation in reviews or walkthroughs.
If there is documented rationale, you would like Roy to point out where you
can find it.
You worked in the campaign against Proposition 187 during your last year
at this company. You called voters from phones lists at "No on 187" headquarters
and you distributed leaflets in your neighborhood. After the election you
gave copies of Cardinal Roger Mahony's statement to many of your co-workers.
The cardinal said the decision by the voters to adopt this proposition "adds
another sad chapter to the history of California." When you saw a newspaper
cartoon with Germany's 1936 anti-Jewish decrees marked to look like Proposition
187 laws, you made copies for people in your office. Your admired friend
Sam Leventhal found the cartoon offensive. You quoted from the Bible, saying
if an alien lives in your land you must count him as one of your own countrymen
and love him as yourself. Michael Gomes didn't agree. He said you probably
don't know the context of these words from the Bible. You told Sam and Michael
and others that bigoted politicians shouldn't spend our tax dollars defending
this doomed proposition.
You retired in December, 1994, the month you and your wife celebrated your
27th wedding anniversary. Like Jim Ray, Joe Metz, Norvel Humphreys, Jim Duval,
Bill Carney, Joy and Larry Bonham, Dan Boyer and Nancy Gunter, you're now
a former employee of this company. Rick Rivera, Pat McGinnis, Dana Taylor,
Tammy Brody, Michael Gomes, John Avery, Roy Hardinge and the others will
follow you some day. Meanwhile, not all of us here will miss your face, you
opinionated old Irish computer hacker.